28 de febrero del 2017
Cindy L. Grines, MD, FACC, Robert O. Bonow, MD, FAHA, FACC, Donald E. Casey, Jr, MD, MPH, MBA, FACP, Timothy J. Gardner, MD, FAHA, FACC, FACS, Peter B. Lockhart, DDS, FDS RCSEd, David J. Moliterno, MD, FAHA, FSCAI, FACC, Patrick O'Gara, MD, FAHA, FACC, Patrick Whitlow, MD, FAHA, FACC
Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine has been shown to reduce cardiac events after coronary stenting. However, many patients and healthcare providers prematurely discontinue dual antiplatelet therapy, which greatly increases the risk of stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and death. This advisory stresses the importance of 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after placement of a drug-eluting stent and educating the patient and healthcare providers about hazards of premature discontinuation. It also recommends postponing elective surgery for 1 year, and if surgery cannot be deferred, considering the continuation of aspirin during the perioperative period in high-risk patients with drug-eluting stents. © 2007 the American Heart Association, Inc., the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the American College of Surgeons, and the American Dental Association.
After placement of a bare-metal stent, thienopyridines (clopidogrel [Plavix, Sanofi-Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ] or ticlopidine [Ticlid, Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Nutley, NJ]), in combination with aspirin therapy, have been shown to dramatically reduce the incidence of early major adverse cardiac events after stent placement compared with aspirin alone or in combination with warfarin (Table 1). In addition, the use of thienopyridine therapy plus aspirin for up to 1 year after non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes is known to decrease the incidence of ischemic cardiovascular events and is recommended in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines for the treatment of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and for the medical treatment of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes.[2-4] Despite these benefits, antiplatelet therapy is sometimes prematurely discontinued within the first year after stent implantation, either by the patient or by a healthcare provider who may not realize these benefits or the potentially severe consequences of antiplatelet therapy cessation. The leading adverse event associated with early antiplatelet discontinuation is stent thrombosis, and the majority of these events lead to acute myocardial infarction (MI) or death. Therefore, the American Heart Association, working with the American College of Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the American College of Physicians, the American College of Surgeons, and the American Dental Association, commissioned this advisory to emphasize the potential complications of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy and to address potential strategies to minimize this occurrence.
|Study||No. of pts studied||No. of pts treated||MACE, %*||P|
|ASA Thienopyridine||ASA Warfarin||ASA alone|
|Hall et al.||226||358||0.8||3.9||0.1|
MACE indicates major adverse cardiovascular events; Pts, patients; ASA, aspirin; ISAR, Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen trial; FANTASTIC, Full ANTicoagulation versus ASpirin TIClopidine after stent implantation; STARS, STent Anticoagulation Regimen Study; and MATTIS, Multicenter Aspirin and Ticlopidine Trial after Intracoronary Stenting.
* Cardiac death, acute MI, or repeat target-vessel revascularization at 30 days (except for the FANTASTIC study).
**Death, MI, or stent occlusion at 6 weeks.
Adapted from ten Berg et al.
Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions recommendations for the prevention of stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation state that, at a minimum, patients should be treated with clopidogrel 75 mg and aspirin 325 mg for 1 month after bare-metal stent implantation, 3 months after sirolimus drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, 6 months after paclitaxel DES implantation, and ideally, up to 12 months if they are not at high risk for bleeding. These recommendations were based on the antiplatelet regimen used in trials that were conducted to obtain US Food and Drug Administration approval (low-risk lesions in low-risk patients) and the anticipated time it takes for the metal stent struts to become adequately endothelialized to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis. However, DESs are now being used in high-risk lesions, and reports have suggested that they may be associated with delayed (or absent) endothelialization,[5,] localized hypersensitivity reactions,[7,] and late stent thrombosis.
Stent thrombosis most commonly occurs in the first month after stent implantation, and in this interval, it is referred to as "subacute stent thrombosis." However, numerous cases of "late" stent thrombosis, particularly in patients who have been treated with DES, have been described as occurring months or even years after stent implantation.[9-21] In the majority of cases, stent thrombosis is a catastrophic event, resulting in life-threatening complications. In a pooled analysis of 6 trials and registries from the 1990s, the incidence of death or MI associated with angiographically documented stent thrombosis was found to be 64.4%. Mortality rates due to presumed or documented stent thrombosis range from 20% to 45%.[19-21]
In the current era of dual antiplatelet therapy, the average reported occurrence of subacute stent thrombosis is 1%.[16-22] The timing of thrombosis appears to be delayed in DES. Late (1 to 12 months) stent thrombosis was not readily apparent with bare-metal stents yet was reported to occur in 0.19% of patients in a large DES registry. Predictors of late stent thrombosis have included stenting of small vessels, multiple lesions, long stents, overlapping stents, ostial or bifurcation lesions, prior brachytherapy, suboptimal stent result (underexpansion, malapposition, or residual dissection), low ejection fraction, advanced age, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, and premature discontinuation of antiplatelet agents (Table 2).[18-21]
|Advanced age||Long stents|
|Acute coronary syndrome||Multiple lesions|
|Low ejection fraction||Ostial or bifurcation lesions|
|Prior brachytherapy||Small vessels|
|Renal failure||Suboptimal stent results|
On December 7-8, 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration convened an advisory panel meeting to discuss stent thrombosis and the overall safety of DES. They concluded that there appears to be a numerical excess of late stent thrombosis with DES, but the magnitude is uncertain; and the off-label use of DES, as with bare-metal stents, is associated with increased risk when compared with on-label use. The panel also agreed that, in the future, new DES studies should have longer follow-up, enroll greater numbers of patients, and include stent thrombosis as a study end point. The advisory panel concurred with the joint clinical practice guideline recommendation for 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after placement of a drug-eluting stent in patients who are not at high risk of bleeding. However, they agreed that a large randomized trial looking specifically at appropriate duration of dual antiplatelet therapy is needed.
The premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy is associated with a marked increase in the risk of stent thrombosis and is the leading independent predictor for stent thrombosis in multivariate analyses. Although the number of actual stent thromboses reported in individual studies is modest, the findings are noteworthy.
In a large observational cohort study of patients treated with DES, stent thrombosis occurred in a striking 29% of patients in whom antiplatelet therapy was discontinued prematurely. This discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 161 (95% confidence interval 26 to 998) for the occurrence of subacute stent thrombosis and a hazard ratio of 57 (95% confidence interval 15 to 220) for the occurrence of late (>30 days) stent thrombosis.
In a single-site study of 652 patients treated with sirolimus DES, premature discontinuation of clopidogrel was associated with an ~30-fold greater risk of stent thrombosis, with >25% of patients who discontinued clopidogrel therapy within the first month suffering stent thrombosis. Park et al. reported on 1911 consecutive patients with DES followed up for a median of 19.4 months. Five (7.8%) of 64 patients with premature interruption of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both experienced stent thrombosis.
Spertus and colleagues published an analysis from the PREMIER (Prospective Registry Evaluating Myocardial Infarction: Events and Recovery) registry of 500 patients with acute MI treated with DES. The mortality rate over the next 11 months of those who stopped thienopyridine therapy was 7.5% compared with 0.7% in those who had not stopped therapy (hazard ratio 9.0, P < 0.0001). Although the rates of stent thrombosis were not reported, it is reasonable to presume that many of the deaths were related to coronary artery disease.
Pfisterer et al. randomized 746 patients (1133 lesions) to DES versus bare-metal stents. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months, after which aspirin alone was continued. At 30 days, rates of death or nonfatal MI were lower in the DES group (2.0% versus 4.6%, P = 0.05); however, after discontinuation of clopidogrel at 6 months, late stent thrombosis (2.6% versus 1.3%) and death or nonfatal MI (4.9% versus 1.3%) occurred more frequently in the DES group.
Similarly, Eisenstein et al. reported an observational study in 4666 patients with follow-up at 6, 12, and 24 months after stenting. In patients treated with bare-metal stents, continued use of clopidogrel did not influence death or MI rates between 6 and 24 months. Conversely, in DES patients, extended use of clopidogrel at 6, 12, and 24 months was associated with reduced death or death/MI rates at all time intervals.
Several reports have specifically described incidents of stent thrombosis that occurred after the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy for noncardiac surgery among patients recently treated with coronary stents.[24-26] Kaluza et al. reported on 40 patients treated with bare-metal stents who underwent noncardiac surgery within 6 weeks of stent implantation. Seven patients had an MI, of which 6 were fatal. Stent thrombosis was presumed to be the cause of all MIs. In 5 of 7 cases, thienopyridine therapy (ticlopidine) had been withheld before surgery. In a similar analysis of 47 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery within 90 days of bare-metal stent implantation, 6 of the 7 patients in whom thienopyridine therapy was discontinued died "in a manner suggestive of stent thrombosis."26
Premature cessation of thienopyridine may occur for several different reasons. The cost of clopidogrel (approximately $4 daily) has been cited as one reason patients discontinue (or do not renew) their therapy. It is unclear whether the introduction of modestly lower-cost generic clopidogrel will significantly affect this issue. In an analysis from the PREMIER registry, factors identified with premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy included older age, not having completed high school, not being married, not receiving discharge instructions for medication use, not being referred for cardiac rehabilitation, greater likelihood of having preexistent cardiovascular disease or anemia, and not seeking health care because of cost. The study authors concluded that "additional patient education about the rationale for and importance of continuing thienopyridine treatment may be needed--particularly for patients with less formal education."
Dual antiplatelet therapy is not without risk. Like all antithrombotic agents, both aspirin and clopidogrel increase the risk of bleeding compared with placebo. When compared with aspirin, clopidogrel may be associated with lower risk of GI bleeding. However, when clopidogrel was combined with aspirin and administered for prolonged duration (up to 28 months), randomized trials demonstrated an absolute increase (ranging from 0.4% to 1.0%) in major bleeding, compared with aspirin alone.
Antiplatelet therapy may be stopped at the instruction of physicians, dentists, and other healthcare providers who are to perform an invasive or surgical procedure on the patient because of misguided concerns about excessive procedure-related bleeding. Unfortunately, many patients are routinely instructed to stop "blood thinners" before such procedures without a thorough evaluation of the rationale for such therapy and without distinction between warfarin and antiplatelet agents. Many of these procedures (eg, minor surgery, teeth cleaning, and tooth extraction) can likely be performed at no or only minor risk of bleeding or could be delayed until the prescribed antiplatelet regimen is completed. Although there is a longstanding concern on the part of dental practitioners about the possibility of prolonged bleeding during and after invasive dental procedures on patients receiving antiplatelet drugs, a recent prospective study of single-tooth extractions on patients randomized to aspirin versus a placebo failed to show a statistically significant difference in postoperative bleeding. Although there are no prospective studies of invasive dental procedures on patients taking a thienopyridine alone or in combination with aspirin, there are also no well-documented cases of clinically significant bleeding after dental procedures, including multiple dental extractions. Given the relative ease with which the incidence and severity of oral bleeding can be reduced with local measures during surgery (eg, absorbable gelatin sponge and sutures) and the unlikely occurrence of bleeding once an initial clot has formed, there is little or no indication to interrupt antiplatelet drugs for dental procedures.
The likelihood of increased bleeding and/or an increased requirement for blood transfusion in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery can be inferred from reports of increased bleeding when cardiac surgery (including off-pump coronary bypass grafting) is undertaken in patients taking a thienopyridine drug. Independent documentation of the scope of this risk of increased bleeding during noncardiac surgery, however, is not available. If one must discontinue the thienopyridine drug before major surgery to reduce the risk of excessive bleeding, consideration should be given to continuing aspirin for its antiplatelet action to mitigate the risk of late stent thrombosis and to restarting the thienopyridine as soon as possible. Although some have attempted "bridging" stent patients with antithrombin agents, there is no evidence of a benefit of warfarin (Table 1) or other antithrombins, and there is an increased risk of bleeding. Similarly, there are no data to support the use of "bridging" glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents.
Thienopyridine therapy in combination with aspirin has become the mainstay antiplatelet treatment strategy for the prevention of stent thrombosis. Premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy markedly increases the risk of stent thrombosis, a catastrophic event that frequently leads to MI and/or death. Factors contributing to premature cessation of thienopyridine therapy include drug cost, physician/dentist instructions to patients to discontinue therapy before procedures, and inadequate patient education and understanding about the importance of continuing therapy.
To eliminate premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy, this advisory group gives the following recommendations.
|Writing group member||Organization represented||Employment||Research grant||Other research support||Speakers' bureau/ Honoraria||Ownership interest||Consultant / Advisory board||Other|
|Cindy L. Grines||AHA Representative||William Beaumont Hospital||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Robert O. Bonow||AHA Representative||Northwestern University||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Donald E. Casey, Jr||ACP Representative||Atlantic Health||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Timothy J. Gardner||ACS Representative||Christiana Care Health System||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Peter B. Lockhart||ADA Representative||Carolinas Medical Center||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|David J. Moliterno||SCAI Representative||University of Kentucky||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Patrick O'Gara||ACC Representative||Brigham and Women's Hospital||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Patrick Whitlow||ACC Representative||Cleveland Clinic||None||None||None||None||ICONInterventionalSystems, *Medlogics*||None|
AHA indicates American Heart Association; ACP, American College of Physicians; ACS, American College of Surgeons; ADA, American Dental Association; SCAI, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; and ACC, American College of Cardiology.
This table represents the relationships of writing group members that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be "significant" if (1) the person receives $10 000 or more during any 12-month period or 5% or more of the person's gross income; or (2) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be "modest" if it is less than "significant" under the preceding definition.
|Reviewer||Employment||Research grant||Other research support||Speakers' bureau/ Honoraria||Expert witness||Ownership interest||Consultant / Advisory board||Other|
|Elliott M. Antman||Brigham and Women's Hospital||Eli Lilly*||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Gregory J. Dehmer||Texas A&M University College of Medicine and Scott & White Clinic||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|T. Bruce Ferguson||East Carolina University||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Raymond J. Gibbons||Mayo Clinic||Radiant Medical,** KAI Pharmaceuticals,** TargeGen,** TherOx**||None||None||None||None||Hawaii Biotech,* TIMI 37A*||None|
|Arthur H. Jeske||University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Vincenza Snow||American College of Physicians||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be "significant" if (1) the person receives $10 000 or more during any 12-month period or 5% or more of the person's gross income; or (2) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be "modest" if it is less than "significant" under the preceding definition.
Fuente: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 69:334–340 (2007)
Ultima actualizacion: 3 DE ABRIL DE 2007